+
From: "Frank Ejby Poulsen" <frank.ejby.poulsen@xxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 19:03:53 +0200
It is just me, or anyone else thinks it is paradoxical to read all this
judgements about "Foucault thought this or that", whilst Foucault developed
the archaeological method to avoid precisely such psychological
interpretations of authors? Not only "The Archaeology of Knowledge" explains
this particularity in opposition to traditional "psychological"
interpretations in the history of ideas, but I also remember an interview he
gave where at the end he lamented about how judgemental people were and how
impossible it was to imagine a world with no judgement at all. Just a little
thought...
Frank.