+
From: bradley nitins <b.nitins@xxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:55:57 +1000
It seems to me that just as the intellectual history of the 19th
century can be distilled down to two seminal names, Marx and
Nietzsche, that of the 20th C is encapsulated in the names Weber and
Foucault. The intimate connections between them are increasingly
being made clear by a number of scholarly works and articles. The
consensus being that both shared a concern for the inscription of
power upon the modern body. But is this not the result of simply
concentrating upon two of the most popular works of these thinkers,
that of the _Protestant Ethic_ and _Discipline and Punish_
respectively? What if we broaden our perspective to encompass their
entire oeuvre? What consonances do we find now? Perhaps now it is
embodied in their historical analysis of the social production types
of modern rationality? This seems rather clear in reference to Weber,
but cloudier when applied to Foucault, especially in regards to his
earlier works. Can we see this concern binding together _Madness and
Civilization_ , _The Order of Things_ and _Discipline and Punish_?
What do the list members think? Is the analysis of a historical
episteme in _Order of Things_ centered on a form of discriminating
judgement, of the disappearance of a world of undifferentiated
similitude and its replacement by a world founded in the anxious need
for rigorous analysis, a prefiguring- on an archeological level, that
is, on the level of formations of discourse- what _Discipline and
Punish_ does on a genealogical level, on the level of material
practices? Can the common dominator for both historical accounts be
simply reduced to a concern for elucidating modern forms of
rationality? Or do list members see another binding thread here?
What, in the list members opinions, are the best scholarly works
treating the convergences [or for that matter divergences] between
_Order of Things_ and _Discipline and Punish_? I look forward to
your responses.
best
bradley
"Of all writings I love only those which the writer writeth with his
blood. Write in blood, and thou shalt learn that blood is spirit"
Nietzsche. "Thus Spake Zarathustra".