FOUCAULT.INFO

 
Foucault-L

Re: Acronyms and Republicanism

List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 08967…

 
+  From: "Mark Kelly" <mgekelly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:59:02 +1100
I think Australian nationalist discourse is in a conceptual riptide at the
moment. I've written an article about this and Society Must Be Defended,
which I'm hoping contretemps will publish in their next issue.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lionel Boxer" <lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Acronyms and Republicanism


> You are right, vacuous because I was pissed and emotive when I typed it; I
> had just returned from a drinking session with some monarchists !-) I am
> surprised the spelling was so accurate!
>
> Having said that, what remains if a nation's heritage is dumped. The risk
> is that whatever is the most appealing to the widest population becomes
> adopted for as long as it remains in vogue. Or am I still intoxicated
with
> an out of date discourse?

Previous by Thread: Re: Acronyms and Republicanism
Next by Thread: Re: Acronyms and Republicanism 'Nation'
Partial thread listing: