+
From: Clifford Duffy <cwduff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 14:35:41 -0400
-- Paul thanks for pointing out all that. At least this opening sentence
should not even be an issue. However it is for some and thanks for your
note. CD
.>
>
>The claim that heterosexuality is a social construction and that it is
>involved in a certain structure of power does not itself imply the
>OPPOSITE: that we should all become homosexuals.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
+ Previous by Thread:
Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a
+ Next by Thread:
Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a
Partial thread listing:
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a, (continued…)
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a,
Clifford Duffy
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a,
Clifford Duffy
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a,
Clifford Duffy
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a,
Nathan Goralnik
- Re: Foucault and pragmatism, q&a,
Paul Bryant