FOUCAULT.INFO

 
Foucault-L

Re: History of ...

List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 06274…

 
+  From: "Ben B. Day" <bday@xxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 18:13:42 -0500 (EST)
Well, I think he meant this statement literally, not metaphorically.
We derive history from texts or other linguistic mediums.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Bob wrote:

> >Historians, as Gadamer puts it, immerse themselves in the
> >stream of history - history is like one extremely large text,
> >and its events and epochs constitute chapters or books.
>
> And yet, "history" can hardly be reduced to a diachronic/linear
> model. While indeed it unfolds in time, it does not appear to me to
> be a text, which to me implies being read diachronically (granted,
> you may skip around, check the index, check the footnotes), but the
> experience to me inferred by "reading" is one of diachronicity.
> Rather I find history to be more synchronous, hence more like a
> matrix.
>
>


Previous by Thread: Re: History of ...
Next by Thread: Re: History of ...
Partial thread listing: