Re: commentary is a minstral show

At 05:10 PM 1/11/99 -0800, Tony Roberts wrote:

>for example, kept the gentleman junkie from expresiing his need with
>through and for language. In the fifties, the junkie was an invisible
>man disappeared behind a (in exactly Foucaults' sense) commentary
>about vice and virtue.

Could you clarify for me the distinction (if any) between commentary and
discourse in Foucault?

Regards