FOUCAULT.INFO
                  

 

Re: commentary is a minstral show


List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 04981…

 
+  From: WIGMOOR FRANCIS <wwfrancs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 03:30:24 +0500
At 05:10 PM 1/11/99 -0800, Tony Roberts wrote:

>for example, kept the gentleman junkie from expresiing his need with
>through and for language. In the fifties, the junkie was an invisible
>man disappeared behind a (in exactly Foucaults' sense) commentary
>about vice and virtue.

Could you clarify for me the distinction (if any) between commentary and
discourse in Foucault?

Regards


Previous by Thread: re: commentary is a minstral show
Next by Thread: Re: commentary is a minstral show
Partial thread listing: