FOUCAULT.INFO
                  

 

reified agency?


List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 04155…

 
+  From: reutherr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+  Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 13:46:41 -0600
Comrades:
"Reification" begins/emanates in a simultaneous way from a
unified subject, right? in other words, commodities are the products of
labour, but labour is not the product of commodities? The Homo
Economicus argument is an intellectual impasse. Not surprising that
someone put the (rather trendy) word "agency" next to "reification" in
the posts... next everyone follows w/out discussion of how the two
relate? Where does that lead us? "Reification" w/out any mention of
discourse: a totalizing transcendance, a "biunification" of sorts, yeh?

RICH X OUT

Previous by Thread: Re: reified agency?
Next by Thread: Re : impact
Partial thread listing: