FOUCAULT.INFO
                  

 

Re: epistemic violence


List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed
switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 02911…

 
+  From: chrsowen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Chris Owen)
+  Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 21:09:09 +0800
>Epistemic or epistemological violence: dragging the discourse/language
>game/phrase universe of the Other across another one that it should not
>be held responsible for in order to clobber it. Example: when an
>Enlightenment spokesperson calls a post-structuralist a RELATIVIST in
>order to dismiss her, this is epistemic violence. Because the
>post-structuralist does not recognize the distinction between the
>'absolute' and the 'relative.' For her, there is nothing BUT the
>relative, and the question is about how to go about negotiating it
>ethically.

Pardon? "Nothing but the relative?" How can one negotiate ethically then?




Previous by Thread: Re: epistemic violence
Next by Thread: Re: epistemic violence
Partial thread listing: