FOUCAULT.INFO

 

Foucault-L mail-list

Re: more pseudo defense of habermas


List Information Page | search this list | RSS Feed    - switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 01448…

 
+  From: "Bryan A. Alexander" <bnalexan@xxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 23:35:05 -0500 (EST)
This is turning out to be a good thread after all:



Bryan Alexander Department of English
email: bnalexan@xxxxxxxxx University of Michigan
phone: (313) 764-0418 Ann Arbor, MI USA 48103
fax: (313) 763-3128 http://www.umich.edu/~bnalexan

On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, jln wrote:

> Sam,
>
> I don't think there is a question about whether people should read
> Habermas. I think they should. He has some very interesting and
> insightful ideas. For example, I find his explanation of the colonization
> of the lifeworld very powerful in explaining just what is goin on. The
> lifeworld, our world of menaning, is being debunked of its
> "meaning-giving" power b the forces of (bad) rationalization. Meaning is
> taken away by the use of money and bureacracy which is not concerned with
> meaning but only with action. This harkens back to my comments about the
> early Frankfurt School in that they hold that architectonic structures like
> Kant's system are devoid of any substantial goals- that is goals of meaning
> and freedom.

I can't see any way Habermas adds to the work of Horkheimer and esp.
Adorno on this. They took on the administered world decades before H.

>...

------------------

Previous by Thread: Re: more pseudo defense of habermas
Next by Thread: Re: more pseudo defense of habermas
Partial thread listing: