FOUCAULT.INFO
 
 
Foucault-L RE: 'ndeolive' - ethic or technology ?
List Information Page + ...search this list + RSS Feed

message ## 00038… switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
+  From: WIDDER@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
+  Date: Thu, 15 Sep 94 11:53 BST
Just a quick reply to KJM's question regarding deconstruction as an ethic.
It would not be proper to call it a 'system of morality', but perhaps the
idea of an 'ethical sensisbility' would be better (Foucault, too, offered
an ethical sensibility formed through care of the self against some sort of
moral system of rules and regulations). Anyway, it would involve a sensibility
that both drives the deconstructionist reading of 'texts' (and social,
political and ethical situations can also be seen as 'texts' to be
deconstructed) and which is affirmed through deconstruction.

Simon Critchley has an excellent book that deals with these issues: THE
ETHICS OF DECONSTRUCTION: DERRIDA AND LEVINAS.

Nathan
widder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Previous by Thread: Re: Nazis
Next by Thread: 'ndeolive' - ethic or technology ?
Partial thread listing: