Foucault-L

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions — General Comment

alasdair mcmillan — 2012-01-30T16:36:05+05:30

The initial suggestion of a discussion along Foucauldian lines of this question is a great one I think. Foucault would be the first to remind us that 'copyright' is by no means some *a priori *natural right of the author - and that rather it is a legal framework set up in a specific historical moment, more of a discursive operation which *creates *the very modern notion of author, than an inherent right of authorship. He says pretty much exactly this in 'What is an author?' if I recall, that the notion of an author comes into being at the very same time as authorship is caught up in a highly elaborated system of rights and property. And then of course this is by no means a 'universal or constant' feature of writing... claims of the death of the author, &c... and moreover much of the mainstream discourse about piracy and theft is no more than an attempt to shoehorn morality and guilt into what should be a question of legal utility. So with morality and silly notions of a *natural right *to profit from authorsh...

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions — General Comment

Allen Miller — 2012-01-30T15:26:11+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions — General Comment

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-30T12:58:17+05:30

Here responding to Timothy, but also following the general comment initiated by him. (sorry again for my english, still working on it) The aim of the debate was first to allow me, as a french student, to get access to english e-books, may they be free or not. Of course it's always thrilling to download the latest version of a 50$ book for free, as a searchable pdf file. (I recall of my first online orgasm : when I found Le foucault électronique, a multi terms searchable file containing almost all of Foucault's books, including Dits et Ecrits. Talking about Foucault's opinion about free e-books (if one may say so), while downloading this treasure I immediately thought I was violating Foucault's own ethics about the concept of oeuvre. All of Foucault's books and articles and talks, within the same file ? With electronic data processing allowed ? Oh gosh, it was almost blasphemy. Anyway, I own a whole drawer overflowing with Foucault's books, which I invariably buy.) For me and my french collegues, the problem ...

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions — General Comment

Timothy O'Leary — 2012-01-30T12:14:09+05:30

Dear Foucault-philes, Following this discussion of where to download Foucault-related books, and in light of the recent sudden demise of Megaupload, I wonder if anybody has considered what Foucault himself would say about the (illegal) free downloading of published books? We all know the interview in which he says he'd like to see a year of publishing anonymously - but I don't recall the year of free books! I ask because I have found my own books on some of these sites and I have to admit that at the time I told my publisher about it. Informing on the free flow of information is shameful isn't it. Or is it? The problem is that if my publisher didn't get paid for their books then they wouldn't be offering contracts to me (or anybody else), which would cause serious problems for us all - esp when it comes to getting jobs, tenure, etc — not to mention putting citations in your bibliography. I understand that access to philosophy shouldn't be dependent on financial means, esp for graduate students. But isn't that...

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions (subject closed)

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-30T11:30:51+05:30

I have some problems with aaaaarg.org, for which I registered, but from which I didn't received a confirmation or a password yet. When you login with false informations, they tell you the website has been taken down. That's why. I'll be waiting patiently. Anyway, thanks for helping. Tiffany

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Amitranjan Basu — 2012-01-30T09:24:41+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Aragorn Eloff — 2012-01-30T09:11:16+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Teresa Mayne — 2012-01-29T23:03:20+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Michael Reno — 2012-01-29T22:53:48+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list _______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Michael Reno — 2012-01-29T22:51:58+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list _______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-29T22:44:53+05:30

Hi everyone, Some people advise aaaarg.org, aaaaarg.org, or a.aaaarg.orgI've tried all of them, with even more "a" ! ^^But all of them tell me that aaaarg.org "doesn't exist" or "is down". Does anyone have tried to reach it in the past few days ? Any advice ? Thanx Tiffany

Re: [Foucault-L] Online versions

Teresa Mayne — 2012-01-29T22:35:20+05:30

[Foucault-L] Online versions

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-29T21:50:33+05:30

Hi everyone, What database do you use to download your books ? The only online database I know is Gigapedia, but they don't have all the books in the world. Sadly, I live in France, and that means that the only access I can get to english books or articles is the internet. I'm currently working in the field of the history of sexuality. Can anyone help me ? I'm not only thinking about free databases. Thanks a lot, Best, Tiffany P.

Re: [Foucault-L] book: Foucault, Knowledge and History

indrajeet — 2012-01-25T01:04:17+05:30

please send the book archeology of knowledge by foucault ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucian Popescu" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:41 PM Subject: [Foucault-L] book: Foucault, Knowledge and History --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [Foucault-L] disciplinary society

Anthony O'Brien — 2012-01-24T22:06:31+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

Re: [Foucault-L] disciplinary society

martin hardie — 2012-01-24T21:28:35+05:30

[Foucault-L] The caging of America

Anthony O'Brien — 2012-01-24T18:29:01+05:30

Hello list members I'm posting this link to the New Yorker because I believe Foucault scholars may find it of interest. It covers incarceration in the US, and has sone intersting comment on the relationship to slavery, at least in the southern states. best wishes Tony O'Brien New Zealand http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2012/01/30/120130crat_atlarge_gopnik?currentPage=all

Re: [Foucault-L] disciplinary society

Rodrigo Pennesi — 2012-01-24T16:27:16+05:30

dear Kevin, In Security, Territory, Population Foucault says that the disciplinary mecanism, called modern, begins in the XVIII century, but the contemporary mecanism is the security. He raises two points, one is the question that in our societies the general economy of power is becoming of the order of security; and the possibility that we are seeing the birth of a security society. The fact that we are seeing the birth of a security society could indicate that we are leaving the disciplinary society, but Foucault does not say that, at least not that I'm aware of. Regards, Rodrigo. 2012/1/24 Kevin Turner :

[Foucault-L] book: Foucault, Knowledge and History

Lucian Popescu — 2012-01-24T16:11:20+05:30

http://www.euroinst.ro/titlu.php?id=1163

[Foucault-L] disciplinary society

Kevin Turner — 2012-01-24T16:01:50+05:30

Dear Foucault listers, Did Foucault ever actually state anywhere that "we live in a disciplinary society" or is this another instance of secondary commentary getting attributed back to Foucault? I have searched through all the relevant texts and can find no instance of him having said this. There are a number of instances - in Psychiatric Power (p. 66), Society Must be Defended (p. 253), Discipline and Punish (p. 216), The Birth of Biopolitics (p. 259), for example - where he uses the phrase "disciplinary society," but in all these instances, he seems to be referring to the time and place under discussion in each respective study, not the present. Regards, Kevin. ____________________________________________________________ Send any screenshot to your friends in seconds... Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks. TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if2 for FREE

Re: [Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Aragorn Eloff — 2012-01-23T12:07:44+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list _______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list _______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

[Foucault-L] Ressource found - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-23T11:16:05+05:30

Hi everyone, Thanks to a couple of foucaltians, I've got the hole book in pdf. You can find it here : http://www.4shared.com/office/2zadC_PY/Blackwell_-_Foucault_A_critica.html Best, Tiffany P. From: princeptiffany@xxxxxxxxxx To: foucault-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:47:53 +0100 Hi everyone, I'm trying to get access to David Couzens Hoy's Foucault: A Critical Reader. But it's unavailable in my country (France) ! I need Arnold Davidson's article, "Archeology, Genealogy, Ethics". Is anyone able to help me, for example with an online version ? Thanks a lot, and sorry for my bad english, Tiffany P.

Re: [Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-23T11:13:19+05:30

Hi Teresa, I have to inform you that aaaarg.org has been moved to a.aaaarg.org, which "doesn't exist". You should try to visit it, it's written in big letters at a.aaaarg.org : "A.AAARG.ORG DOESN'T EXIST" !How funny !! Anyway, I've got my article now. Best, Tiffany P.

Re: [Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-23T11:09:52+05:30

Hi Juliana, Thank you for your help ! I had seen it a long time ago, but I thought I had to get a premium access to download. Well, now I have my article. Best, Tiffany P.

Re: [Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Teresa Mayne — 2012-01-22T21:36:47+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Juliana Fausto — 2012-01-22T20:59:51+05:30

[Foucault-L] Ressource needed - Foucault: A Critical Reader

Tiffany P. — 2012-01-22T14:47:43+05:30

Hi everyone, I'm trying to get access to David Couzens Hoy's Foucault: A Critical Reader. But it's unavailable in my country (France) ! I need Arnold Davidson's article, "Archeology, Genealogy, Ethics". Is anyone able to help me, for example with an online version ? Thanks a lot, and sorry for my bad english, Tiffany P.

[Foucault-L] Building knowlege

Lorenzo Brito Morales — 2012-01-04T04:46:57+05:30

hi all, sorry for my englis. I wrotte a post about programming and foucualt here is what i made it. " is these philosophie or programing topic Im following a tutorial from codeacademy about javascript and found a topic very interesting the world of philosphie and basic knowledge in programming here is Truth is relative In JavaScript, there are 6 "falsy" values (values that evaluate to false): false, null, undefined, 0, "" (the empty string), and NaN Anything else evaluates to true. Michel Foucault says that there is not true about knowlege in the life, it is building with the time and the role that people play about certain object. So with the history is building the knowlege until for the last generation a knowlege is teached as the true thing. In progamming first you have to know that certains value return true not because its a true indepent of human knowlege just because many people say hey , these is going to be truee so like Foucault says Knowlege is builded. " here is the link to my blog http://lorbrit...

[Foucault-L] Statistics 2011

Pozzo — 2012-01-03T13:02:56+05:30

A few statistics about Foucault-L: - Foucault-L has been completely unmoderated since June 2006, the list auto-regulates quite well. - 170 posts in 2011 (276 in 2010, 329 in 2009, 527 in 2008, 367 in 2007, 346 in 2006, 321 in 2005) - exactly 1021 subscribers as of today (1005 in 2010, 1036 in 2009, 1001 in 2008, 905 in 2007) Remember Foucault-L can also be read in a feed reader: http://foucault.info/Foucault-L/archive/f-maillist.rdf In addition to Foucault-L, you might post questions and comments in our Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/foucault.info Best regards, Camille, list-admin

[Foucault-L] Foucault and Latour

John Humbers — 2011-11-21T00:52:16+05:30

Hello all, I am currently working on a university project whereby I will be performing a comparative analysis between Foucault and Bruno Latour and their understanding of power. I am at the early stages of this project so if anyone has any ideas they would be most welcome. I have the idea of comparing Latour's Actor Network theory with Foucault's idea of capillary power. Does anyone know where Foucault best expresses his views regarding this? Another area that I need to look into further is how Foucault treats material objects and whether he considers them to have agency. Any help would be much appreciated. Best wishes, John

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) — 2011-11-19T17:33:47+05:30

[Foucault-L] power, logics, power, evolution and balance

Elvin King — 2011-11-19T12:44:37+05:30

the truth, is truth, only because it is power. the power, is power, only because it is the truth concidering Obama has "power" over military, but can not control nor military nor objectives in ecology, economy or politics he has no power but no one has?! someone controls an industry, a variety of profits dictate a solution, the profit of the industry, but also the wisdom or lack thereof of the buyer. a commercial agency controls the wisdom of the buyer. or lack thereof someone controls the military someone controls, the guns. suppose someone has the total power, military and economic? then what does he have? his own personality would see benefit for the earth, which in most terms, is, fatal, in obama's terms, is, rather innocent. now you need advice, because everyone thinks, you don't have the power, if you are such a fuckup. now from all this advice, there has to crystalize one remedy or solution. that would be "the power" since, it would be the future and how to work onwards. now lets work opposite what if...

Re: [Foucault-L] What Is Enlightenment?

Russ Anderson — 2011-11-19T00:17:20+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

Re: [Foucault-L] What Is Enlightenment?

Rodrigo Pennesi — 2011-11-18T22:41:48+05:30

There are two different texts with that name, both listed as been from 1984 in the "dits et écrtis" 1- number 339 "What is Enligthenment?" ("Qu'est-ce que les Lumières?"), in Rabinow (P.), éd., The Foucault Reader, New York, Pantheon Books, 1984, pp.32-50 2- number 351 "Qu'est-ce que les Lumières?", Magazine littéraire, n207, mai 1984, pp.35-39 (Extrait du cours du 5 janvier 1983, au Collège de France.) according to this reference, the first publication was actually in English. greetings from Rio Rodrigo Pennesi 2011/11/18 Russ Anderson :

[Foucault-L] What Is Enlightenment?

Russ Anderson — 2011-11-18T21:50:51+05:30

Hi all, One quick question: does anyone have handy a publication date for Foucault's paper 'What is Enlightenment?' I know that "What is Critique?" was published in 1978, and that he takes up Kant's paper again in the 1982-83 lectures at the College, but I cant seem to find a date for "What is Enlightenment?" other than its 1984 translation into English in The Foucault Reader. Much appreciated, Russell

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Kevin Turner — 2011-11-16T03:33:26+05:30

I don't know how useful this may be, but I find it helpful to think of puissance as having the power to be able to act and pouvoir as being able to exercise power: i.e. pouvoir draws my attention to that which need to be in place (tactic, mechanism, technique, technology, etc.) in order to be able to exercise power, i.e. to be able to act on the actions of others, to be able to conduct the conduct of others, etc. In other words, pouvoir draws my attention to all the mundane, tiny, heterogeneous ingredients from which power is made. - k ____________________________________________________________ Send any screenshot to your friends in seconds... Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks. TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if2 for FREE

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Anthony O'Brien — 2011-11-16T02:17:40+05:30

_______________________________________________ Foucault-L mailing list

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) — 2011-11-16T02:01:35+05:30

[Foucault-L] structuralism applied to visual arts and philosophy from 1770 to 2010

Elvin King — 2011-11-15T23:39:46+05:30

as foucault posed us a question. "how did man become the object of knowledge?" It seems subjectivity is a trap. The more you define yourself as a subject, the more you need to know. the only solution to this seems to me, a theory and analysis or the collection of main canons within culture a relation to aesthetics and the analysis of forming of trees and mountains to art and comparions of visual imagery and construction of a diagram of cultural sensitivities. Here is the basics to such a schedual if added, the evolution of technology, amount of cars in 1920, 1950 1970, 1990 2010, we have ourselves a curious evolution. following mails in dutch and english * 'bout one turn o' yer hourglass agoAlas De Ellendeh * http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1692148816232&set=a.1692148536225.2083185.1013111161&type=3&theater * lecture at Aureli's class Hauled in by: Alas De Ellendeh Blabber t' yer mates * 'bout one turn o' yer hourglass agoAlas De Ellendeh * http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1692150056263&set=a....

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Kevin Turner — 2011-11-15T22:42:32+05:30

Hi Tiffany P., and thanks for helping clarify the distinction between these two terms for me. of course, the other distinction that does not always come across in English translation is the distinction Foucault makes between savoir and connaissance. i think this is at the root of many a misunderstadning/misinterpretation of foucault's work Regards - k ____________________________________________________________ TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if5 Capture screenshots, upload images, edit and send them to your friends through IMs, post on Twitter®, Facebook®, MySpace™, LinkedIn® – FAST!

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Kevin Turner — 2011-11-15T22:39:16+05:30

Hi David, thanks for the references. and i know what you mean about the French - I often woder why I did not chose and English writer as my favorite author. Regards, Kevin. ____________________________________________________________ Send your photos by email in seconds... TRY FREE IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if3 Works in all emails, instant messengers, blogs, forums and social networks.

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

David McInerney — 2011-11-15T19:27:50+05:30

Re: [Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Tiffany P. — 2011-11-15T18:01:35+05:30

Hi Kevin, I don't know if your question has already been answered, but here is what I can tell (I'm french) : in general, the term "puissance" refers to the "capacity of the body", not to political power. "Puissance" has an "inner" aspect which doesn't have "power". In Il faut défendre la société, Foucault talks about "puissance" in a political sense when he refers to colonial political power, or to king's political force. In a sense, and I think you are right, "puissance" isn't appropriate to qualify modern power , but could be for sovereign power, which precisely thinks itself in the terms of "puissance". '(in french you say "grandes puissances industrielles" ou "coloniales", "la puissance économique d'un pays", etc.). The term "puissance" is indeed used when sovereign power comes into question, but in the very expression : "sovereign power", in french he uses the term "pouvoir" and not "puissance" (i.e. "pouvoir souverain"). I found a excerpt in which Foucault states : "En déplaçant l'axe, le centre de gr...

[Foucault-L] pouvoir/puissance

Kevin Turner — 2011-11-13T15:34:12+05:30

Hi to one and all, I was just curious, when Foucault talks of sovereign power - in Il faut défendre la société or La volonté de savoir, for example - does he use the term "puissance" or "pouvoir." Cheers - K ____________________________________________________________ Publish your photos in seconds for FREE TRY IM TOOLPACK at http://www.imtoolpack.com/default.aspx?rc=if4

Re: [Foucault-L] Re : Need help on a reference

Tiffany P. — 2011-11-10T23:28:03+05:30

Hi André, Hi everyone, As time goes by, I'm beginning to doubt about the very existence of this quote .... Maybe I just dreamed it ?Let's just forget it. Concerning my "critique" of Foucault's genealogical analysis, I need to be more specific : my critique is only methodological, and above all is pertinent only regarding the object I'm working on (sexuality).I'm currently working on "sexuality" as a historical experience of pleasures and sexual practices, and especially on its "perverted" historical moment, i.e. the emergence of a discourse on "sexual perversions" in the late 19th century. I'm pursuing a sort of comparative analysis between two historical ways to conceptualise "sexual practices" : 18th century french "libertinage" or debauchery, and 19th century "sexual perversions". In front of this, I ask a simple question : why are they epistologically different, except one is rooted into a moral concern for body and will, while the later is rooted in a medico-psychological concern for body and mind ? Ins...

[Foucault-L] Autoportret Quarterly - Utopias

Michał Choptiany — 2011-11-08T18:20:44+05:30

Dear List Members, The editors of the Autoportret quarterly, a Kraków-based magazine in anthropology of space, are pleased to inform you that the English electronic version of the recent issue dedicated to the relationship of utopian thought and architecture has been published online. You can download all articles for free under this link: http://autoportret.pl/2011/09/15/utopias/. Best regards, Michal Choptiany *** Michał Choptiany "Autoportret. A Quarterly on Good Space" Secretary of the Board choptiany@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.autoportret.pl Malopolska Institute of Culture Karmelicka 27, PL-31-131 Krakow

Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate

Jeffrey Tallane — 2011-11-08T06:32:03+05:30

Hello Machiel, In my opinion, both clearly don't use the same model of "interactive discourse". There is interaction, but this don't mean that they use the same model, nor the same presuppositions. But you are right on the point that there is no distinction between moral truth and knowledge truth in Foucault's perspective, as moral truth is only normativity reclaiming the authority of knowledge. Both moral truth and knowledge truth, pretend to be true, hence to be a correct description of what is, or what should be. But its not in this way that Foucault settled his own problem. When he started his "ontologie critique des discours vrais", this meant to show that simple categories such as "knowledge truth" and "moral truth" are hiding a huge diversity of individual forms. When Foucault introduced the "will to knowledge", it was in the ironical sense to criticise the aristotelician pretention of a non-engaged truth held by a new kind of psycho-social caracter called the "philosopher" who claimed that truth shoul...

Re: [Foucault-L] Re : Need help on a reference

André Nunes — 2011-11-07T21:09:56+05:30

[Foucault-L] London Critical Theory Summer School 2012

joshua j. kurz — 2011-11-04T01:18:25+05:30

Thought people would find this interesting. Apologies for cross posting. j**** ------------------------------ *Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities* *London Critical Theory Summer School 2012* *11th June - 22nd June* ** ** The 2012 London Critical Theory Summer School will take place at Birkbeck from 11th June - 22nd June. This unique opportunity is for graduate students and academics to follow a course of study and to foster exchange and debate. It will consist of at least 6 modules over the two weeks, each convened by one of the participating academics. This course does not offer transfer of credits. Deadline for applications: 3rd February 2012**** *Information on how to apply can be found here: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/bih/activities/lcts* ** ** *Participating Academics will include:* Etienne Balibar**** Wendy Brown**** Drucilla Cornell**** Costas Douzinas**** Stephen Frosh**** Gayatri Spivak**** Slavoj Zizek**** ** ** ------------------------------ For more information, contact: Julia Eisner Institute for th...

Re: [Foucault-L] Re : Need help on a reference

Tiffany P. — 2011-11-03T21:55:56+05:30

Hi "klossi", Thanks for the answer, and the reference. Nevertheless, the excerpt I am looking for takes part in the foucaltian critique of the analysis of utterances from a hierarchical point of view (as they are, according to Foucault, put into question in the traditional analysis of langage and discourse). As a consequence, I'm pretty sure that the excerpt I am looking for is quite contradictory with the excerpt you pointed out ! :)I'm thinking here of range of assertions (made in a period contemporaneous with the Archeology of knowledge) in which Foucault precisely refuses to distinguish between utterances that have an "direct effect " on social organization (for example rules and regulations that are applied) and utterances that are, as one might say, just said or written in vain ? We can think about the following question in the same terms : is the fact that the "death by fire" sentence for sodomy was only exceptionnally pronouced relevant ? From an archeological point of view, it is not (from a genealo...

Re: [Foucault-L] Foucault-Habermas Debate

Karskens, M.L.J. (Machiel) — 2011-11-03T16:20:18+05:30

[Foucault-L] Re : Need help on a reference

emmanuel pehau — 2011-11-03T14:57:53+05:30

Closest thing I can think of : "Vous avez raison de citer le structuralisme. On pourrait reprendre cet exemple majeur, princeps de la méthode structurale, qui consiste dans les règles de prohibition de l'inceste et celles du mariage dans les sociétés primitives, puisque c'est par là, finalement, et grâce au génie de Lévi-Strauss, que l'on a pu appliquer dans le domaine des sciences sociales un certain nombre de modèles formels, empruntés à la linguistique ou éventuellement aux mathématiques. Ce qui m'intéresse, ce n'est pourtant pas cela, et j'ai toujours eu envie de demander aux anthropologues: quel est le fonctionnement réel de la règle de l'inceste ? J'entends la règle, non pas en tant que système formel, mais en tant qu'instrument précis, réel, quotidien, individualisé par conséquent - de coercition. C'est la contrainte qui m'intéresse: comment elle pèse sur les consciences et s'inscrit dans les corps; comment elle révolte les gens et comment ils la déjouent. C'est précisément à ce point de contact, de fr...